Our Future Health Care Bill

Since an US citizen, We believe that, ideally, all residents with this great country of ours should, as human beings, be qualified for appropriate health attention. But how that ideal is accomplished is of great concern in my opinion. We do think that, in crafting the legislation that will define our health care system for years to come, the people of Congress and the President should be aware of the next, basic guidelines (which should be put in our laws if they have not recently been already): Basis by Elysium Health

A tax is a tax is a tax. If something appears like a tax and sounds like a duty and behaves such as a duty, it is a duty. No matter if someone prefers to call a repayment required by the authorities a “service fee” or “insurance premium” or some other name; in the event that an accountability satisfies the description of what a tax is, it is a taxes. 
Any payment (and any portion thereof) that is required by law and collected under threat of penalty is, by description, a tax imposed by the us government. It does not matter to whom the payment is to be made or how a amount of such payment is determined. It also will not matter perhaps the person paying the tax has been said to obtain, in exchange for such payment, some good and service in consideration for such payment.
Similarly, any acquiring a good and service that is required by law constitutes a tax imposed by the government. Regardless of whether anyone, even the party making the purchase, believes the payment to be fair based on the goods and services received. In the event that a purchase or repayment is not voluntary, if it is required by the government, it makes up a tax.
Any section of a tax repayment that is retained by any party in charge of collecting a tax is still a tax. It does indeed not matter whether the government grants the get together permission to keep a part of the tax repayment or the amount that is allowed to be retained. It does not matter what the reason for such permission for retention might be; even if the retention of the tax is cared for as compensation or refund to the collecting agent, the portion of the payment retained still creates a tax payment or section thereof.
The authority to look for the amount of any tax enforced by the government should rest solely with the elected representatives of the individuals. The elected representatives of the people should not have the directly to discharge their responsibility regarding deciding the amount of a tax by asking that responsibility/authority to others. Any elected representative who willfully abdicates his / her responsibility with respect to deciding the quantity of a tax should be subject to fast recall and replacement by those who elected him or her.
All income taxes should be uniformly enforced. In other words, any tax imposed by the government cannot favor one individual over another. As the amount of a taxes paid by different individuals can vary, the most basic after which the amount is determined, that is the formula with which the amount of the taxes is calculated, should be plainly defined and constantly applied.
As much as possible, the tax burden should be equitably sent out, and the amount of a tax should not be determined arbitrarily. To get instance, one cannot duty somebody who was given birth to in July differently from someone who was given birth to in January unless there is a reasonable most basic for doing so. In the same way, one cannot tax someone who works for company A differently from someone who works for company B with no reasonable most basic for doing this.
Any taxpayer who can demonstrate that they had been needed to pay taxes that were set arbitrarily, that were inequitable, and/or that were excessive should be qualified for a full return of the surplus, arbitrary and inequitable taxes collected by or for the federal government.
If goods and services receive in consideration of taxes paid (or any portion thereof), it should be the responsibility of the government to ensure that such goods and services are distributed impartialy and, when appropriate, in reasonable proportion to the taxes paid. Thus, someone who pays $500 in such taxes should generally receive proportionately greater services and goods than someone who pays $300 in such taxes unless, of course, there is a reasonable basis for any disproportionality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *